Rejected image

[tobiasm34551060]

Its not a big deal, but this image was rejected and I don't know why. I really like it, but this is only my opinion.

[sjlocke215]

No idea.  I like it a lot.  Maybe a little heavy on the clarity/sharpening on the tracks?

[Szalam]

What was the rejection reason they gave?

It might look a bit oversharpened, but my guess would be how noisy the image is in the sky. But, again, when an image is rejected, they give a reason. If you tell us what it is, we would have a better guess.

[tobiasm34551060]

The reason was mentioned here in German:

"Ein zu hoher Anteil an Artefakten/Rauschen kann durch zu wenig Licht, ungeeignete Kameraeinstellungen, starke Komprimierung und übermäßige Nachbearbeitung entstehen."

Too high portion of artefacts / noise, maybe because of too less light, inappropriate camera setting, high compression and inappropriate post-processing.

However, I didn't applied a post-processing, only used the advanced night modus of my smartphone. Maybe already too fancy

[Szalam]

As I suspected; it's the noise. Try shooting with a lower ISO.

You might be able to rescue this image by using some denoising tools on it.

[tobiasm34551060]

Thanks for your help Szalam, really appreciated.

[Szalam]

No problem!

Don't forget to come back to the forum and mark the posts that were helpful and use the green star Correct Answer button on the post that solved the problem for you.