Rejected Photographs

[srgdigiart]

Several of my Photographs were rejected on technical issues. 

I would like to know what went wrong so that I can correct myself in future

Regards

S R Ganguly

[RALPH_L]

Same answer as on your previous post. Also, you mmay need a propertry release for the zoo animals.

[Abambo]

Same answer as on your previous post. Also, you mmay need a propertry release for the zoo animals.

By @RALPH_L

The “previous post”, Ralph is referring to, may be found here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/rejected-photographs/m-p/12906175#M426...

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

1) The panda is not sharp and the white fur is blown out. Vignettes are not permitted on submissions.

2) "Tiger" seems to be the main subject of this artwork according to the title of the file, but it isn't clear from the art itself that it's a tiger... Adobe Stock seeks photographs or illustrations that have commerical appeal, and the Moderator apparently felt that this digital art has no commercial appeal. 

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

The tiger has been refused for technical issues, and that is completely correct, as the picture does show countless artefacts, no detail, and has a fancy filter applied. The moderator had an easy job on the 2 pictures, as all 2 get a refusal at first sight. No need to dig in the details.

The panda is in addition oversaturated. As of the nature of the Panda handling, I'm confident, that there is also IP protection involved.

[Abambo]

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html