rejected photos

[Arianne Beeche]

[Nancy OShea]

Hi @Arianne Beeche,

Adobe Stock customers expect highest visual and technical quality for professional use. See links below.
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Also check out what other Stock Contributors are doing in your keyword categories. Keeping in mind that Adobe Stock's inventory  already contains over 9 million sunsets, ask youself "If I were a Stock customer, would I buy this image instead of what is already represented?"

[dasand38214302]

come on man, you are selling this photos for $0.36 and you are talking
"Adobe Stock customers expect highest visual and technical quality for professional use."
 
You are do funny, it is look like you are giving us a thousand of $$$

I’m not saying these photos are great but we are talking about $0.36

[Ralph Lear]

We are not asking for $0.36. That is what we are getting. Adobe customers are paying alot more and that is why they expect quality. I'm sure Adobe is making more than I am but, that is my choice. I do not have to pay for marketing, distribution and employee costs. I can quit at any time. 

[Marianne-Deiters · Accepted solution]

Take a look at the photos in 100% size, what do you see? I see large blurred areas in picture 1 and 3. There is no detail in picture 2. This problem can be seen in many cell phone photos that were photographed with little light. You can take good photos with your mobile phone, so try to photograph simple subjects instead of landscapes first. You could also use a small tripod to avoid blurring.

[Arianne Beeche]

Thank you very much!

[ricky336]

They are blurred, the sunset photo is underexposed and the composition isn't very good as well. They don't make for good stock photos.