Rejected photos

[Robert22095353h1bf]

Please provide a reason for rejecting recent photos.

Please specify exactly what is wrong.

thank you
Robert

[RALPH_L]

you need to show us the original photo.

[Jill_C]

We here in the Community Forum are fellow Contributors, not Adobe employees so we have no way of looking into your account to see your rejected images. Please post a few here in full size, exactly as they were submitted to Adobe so that we can evaluate and provide our opinions.

[Robert22095353h1bf]

Właśnie dostałem dokładnie taka sama odpowiedź, słowo w słowo.

macie dużo takichregułek, a może jesteście cyborgami.

[michalkociumbas]

Nie jesteśmy cyborgami, ale nie pomożemy, jeśli nie zobaczymy prac. Wklej te same pliki tutaj i dostaniesz odpowiedź. Pozdrowienia.

[Jill_C]

As it says on the page that describes the rejection reason:

"If you are looking for specific feedback on your image, we recommend you create a post in the critique forum where you can solicit feedback from other Adobe Stock Contributors."

We are "other Adobe Stock Contributors", not some inanimate bot. If you wish to have feedback regarding your photos, please post them here. If not, good luck with your future submissions!

[Robert22095353h1bf]

Chce znać login lub nazwisko konkretnej osoby, która ocenia moje zdjęcia.

Skoro wy tego nie robicie to wasza opinia nic dla mnie nie znaczy!!!!

Ale proszeę bardzo. Ciekawy jestem co napiszecie. NP: w podglądzie  200% widac szum .

jak rok temu jakaś "mądra" osoba napisała po  sprawdzeniu moich zdjęć.

A czemu nie podgląd 500 % , wtedy z czystym somieniem  możecie napisać że zdjęcie jest złe bo widać pojedyńcze piksele.

[Abambo]

Chce znać login lub nazwisko konkretnej osoby, która ocenia moje zdjęcia.

Skoro wy tego nie robicie to wasza opinia nic dla mnie nie znaczy!!!!

By @Robert22095353h1bf

To nie jest możliwe i to ci nie pomoże. Moderatorzy są rozsiani po całym świecie i odmawiają na pierwszym błędzie, który widzą. Powód odmowy jest ogólny, po prostu mówi ci, w jakim kierunku szukać. Z tym i doświadczeniem, znajdziesz większość błędów. Jeśli nie, sprawdź z nami. Jeśli nie chcesz usłyszeć naszej opinii, to jest OK. Następnie musisz przejść dalej.

[Abambo]

Your shadows are underexposed, saturation and contrast is too high. Your ducks have no datail, and washed out colours (to be seen clearly at 100%), probably because of excessive processing. 

Looking at your pictures at a higher magnification than 100% shows artefacts in your pictures that you do not see that clearly at 100%, but you see them at 100%. It's just more difficult to explain. I check pictures (including mine) at 100% for sharpness and at 200% and 300% for artefacts. With some experience, you clearly know where to look at.

To make you a favour: You see the artefacts clearly at 100% in the trees (and different ones with the ducks). 

[Jill_C]

Again, you seem to have misunderstood the purpose of this Community forum. You will never reach the Moderator that rejected your image via this forum, and, indeed, there is no avenue for you to be in contact with Moderstors. Adobe does not provide a means for you to dispute the findings of the Moderators. And that is with good reason - they would be flooded with demands from contributors who are unable to detect the flaws in their images. 

So go ahead and reject my opinion, but it won't get you any closer to getting your image accepted; nor will you learn to assess your own images before submitting them.

[Jill_C]

The image is very blurry and the shadows are pure black, underexposed with no detail.

[Abambo]

Ani moderatorzy, ani osoby udzielające się tutaj nie są botami. Przykro mi, że muszę cię rozczarować. 

[ricky336]

Hello Robert,

Please provide a reason for rejecting your recent photo, and specify what is wrong.

Ok😊

Have you thought about your white balance?  Currently, there is a green/yellow cast to the lake photo. I think you should reduce the green by adding more tint (magenta) and reducing the temperature slider by reducing the yellow.

Another point is that the shadows are too dark. They are just solid black. So, you could lighten up the shadows, and increase the blacks a bit more.

Did you sharpen this photo? If so, you may have oversharpened a bit.

I see from the EXIF data, you used a manual setting for the White Balance. This explains why the white balance is off.

Does this answer your question? 😊

[Test Screen Name]

Robert as a contributor you need to understand the rules Adobe make. The rules are made for Adobe's convenience, not yours, and to reduce Adobe's costs, not yours. You accepted these rules to become a contributor.

- they can reject any picture

- they will give you a simple reason like "quality issue"

- there is NO APPEAL

- there is NO WAY TO CONTACT THE MODERATOR.

The people in this forum are mostly contributors, many are very experienced professional photographers. They may have had many Adobe rejections themselves, and they have learned. They give up their time to share their knowledge. You can accept their help, or not, but remember they did not make the rules and cannot change them.