Rejection by some technical problems

[Orts]

 Recently I've sent this serial of sport images that had been rejected by technical problems, but nobody told me these technical problems and I can't see where's the problem. Could anyone help me?
Thanks in advance!

 

 

 

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Orts,

These are nice photos. However, they are all underexposed. Details are lost in the shadows.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

[Orts]

Thanks for your report. 

Although that underexposure is intentional to give more relevance to the upper part of the body I'll try to fix it.

Thanks again

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Orts ,

Please note that photos uploaded to Adobe Stock is for uses on all media including print. The black area prints black without details on paper. 

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Hi @Orts ,

You need to fix the background. There is colour banding and noise in the "blacks".

[Orts]

Hi!

I guess that noise is because of the jpeg compression to upload the pics to the forum. The HR pics doesn´t have that artefacts.

Thanks for your answer!

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Orts ,

@Abambo  saw the noise because he zoomed to possibly more than 100%. If any of us see it,it is there on your original and will be rejected for it. I did not see it either because I used the web that did not produce enough zoom for me to see it.

Best wishes

JG

[Orts]

Here you have a 100% crop of one of the pics shown above

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Orts ,

Here is a better view of the problem which also include poor depth of field producing soft edges. If you want to have your pictures on large screens and billboards, then those issues cannot be there.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

[Abambo]

Hi @Orts ,

As @jacquelingphoto2017 correctly stated, I have analysed your picture in Photoshop at 200%, and I've detected those artefacts. It may well be that they are not in the original uploaded file, but I can only look into what I get presented here.

As for Jacquelin's point: I would avoid taking such decisions as that will make your image less attractive to potential buyers. Less shadow would have been great. I find the contrasts between highlights and shadows on the model to harsh for a girl. I look at it and find it disturbing:

[Orts]

Thnak you very much for all your comments!

[jacquelingphoto2017]

You are welcome @Orts