Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Verbbaitum,
Nice to read you again. 😉
No, it's not a cross:
The first:
The second:
(But how is written in the Bible: “They have eyes, but they can't see.”)
As for the first, your program also eliminated the cross. The first earns a refusal for quality, as the logo removal is poorly done. If you look to the cape, you see that also on the second image.
This image exposes camera shake, so the whole picture is unusable.
Quality issues for the second:
Your program does a bad job wi
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Verbbaitum,
Nice to read you again. 😉
No, it's not a cross:
The first:
The second:
(But how is written in the Bible: “They have eyes, but they can't see.”)
As for the first, your program also eliminated the cross. The first earns a refusal for quality, as the logo removal is poorly done. If you look to the cape, you see that also on the second image.
This image exposes camera shake, so the whole picture is unusable.
Quality issues for the second:
Your program does a bad job with the logo removal. It's hard work, even that modern Photoshop makes the task much easier nowadays. And believe me, I have removed logos and added logos during my career. I know the pain points and how to do it so that it does not jump to the eye.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think that is the gas tank fill.
[Moderator deleted private information. Please do not post private information like e-mails and phone numbers]
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Don't include your e-mail signature, when answering.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Well, sometimes it's easier to remove something than to correct. For the photo, you do not need the gas tank.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied