Hello,
after more than 6 weeks of review another photo got rejected because of quality issues.
Up to the beginning of 2023, this picture was one of my pictures (largely) sold in the Adobe Premium collection, where it had been accepted through the EyeEm app/site. After the EyeEm "fall", I had deleted my whole portfolio there so after some time all my pictures in Adobe had been deleted too.
Now, I've tried to upload the same picture in my personal portfolio and it got rejected. Really??
(uploaded from [moderator deleted link])
2 Correct answers
As Mat Hayward stated once: there is no guarantee that pictures that you delete and resubmit get accepted again. The picture here is too small for a critique.
There is sensor dust visible (several, not only the one I pointed out) and you have chromatic aberration.
You also have an IP issue with the number plates of the cars and you have on one of the cars a TDI logo.
I don't know how the vetting has been done previously, but the issues were present in the original file. I also have no clue how to become a premium contributor, but I have never found that premium assets are special, or worth the higher price.
In addition, I have no idea what th
...
12
Replies
Hi Mat,
thanks for your answer.
Technically I didn't delete this picture, the whole EyeEm portfolio was deleted on Adobe with thousands photos from thousands contributore.
So this can be considered my first try with this picture. And, going from Premium to reject is a double step that makes "techincal issue" a bit weird.
There is sensor dust visible (several, not only the one I pointed out) and you have chromatic aberration.
You also have an IP issue with the number plates of the cars and you have on one of the cars a TDI logo.
I don't know how the vetting has been done previously, but the issues were present in the original file. I also have no clue how to become a premium contributor, but I have never found that premium assets are special, or worth the higher price.
In addition, I have no idea what the EyeEm deal was. This picture looks to be quite old, if what I saw from the number plates is correct and correctly interpreted. So this may be a Fotolia story.
*can't
(can't messages here be modified?? 😣)
By @dnleeh
Not as a Community Beginner. That's because forum moderators sometimes need to edit out some expletives and other prohibited content. In the past, those elements reappeared as fast as moderators edited. So Adobe decided to close down the ability to edit entries for forum beginners. I would correct for you, but I don't see where.
about TDI and plates, I think I'd have received a property issue, now and 2 years
By @dnleeh
Having an asset accepted 2 years ago does not make the IP violation go away. IP violations (especially the privacy violations) can get very expensive for Adobe (as they have the cash…).
dust happens and I don't see a dusty shot, honetly. But, if that's a problem, Adobe Stock has become a place for few photographers that can get 33 cents for a perfect photo. I'd rather think Adobe has some storage space issue
By @dnleeh
I see the dust. And dust patches are easy to correct. As for the chromatic aberration: not all aberration goes away with automatic lens correction. And that also is an easy fix. The buyer pays more than 33 cents and a lot of assets sell for a dollar commission. Adobe does not have storage issues.
You fix or you don't. You asked why, you got why.
but my general comment is again: seriously?
By @dnleeh
Yes, seriously.
I like this image, but it is pretty dark and the histogram reflects that. I think this works better with the shadows lifted some.
By @George_F
Night pictures should reflect darkness, and looking on my iPad, I think that it is pretty well exposed.
AdChoices