Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
Could you please help me understand the possible reasons for the rejection of these sample illustrations? I’d appreciate any insights or guidelines that could clarify what might have led to this decision.
Thank you very much in advance for your assistance.
Best regards,
Emma
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your first: besides overexposed elements (circles) in your picture, you have the typical artefacts (arrows), that get created by an overzealous noise compensation algorithm, as it is common on small sensor cameras.
The picture is simply missing the fine details. And I understand well, that it is a detail picture, but in your case, it would have been better to show the whole thing.
You may also encounter property rights issues with this asset, but that I can't judge.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your second picture is missing contrasts, and it may be slightly underexposed. A simple adjustment of the contrasts helps a lot:
The picture also has a washed out look.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your last picture has definitly blown out highlights and is missing contrast.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This area is blownout with no detail that can be recovered.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Some sky replacement would help.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, but OP will need to work on that a bit more. Now the walls and wall roof are too bluish. 😉