Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
These images are small, so I assume they are not the actual files you submitted, which makes acurately assessing tecnical issues difficult.
That said, neither looks really sharp, which might be reason enough for rejection.
In the second one in particular, there are artifacts and banding in the gradients:
But again, hard to say if those are problems in these pictures only, or in the full-res ones that you submitted.
Hope that helps,
Michael
_____________
Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor,
...There is colour banding:
…and the designs are not sharp. If you look at them as “photos”, they are underexposed.
Here the histogram of the read:
and the green one:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
These images are small, so I assume they are not the actual files you submitted, which makes acurately assessing tecnical issues difficult.
That said, neither looks really sharp, which might be reason enough for rejection.
In the second one in particular, there are artifacts and banding in the gradients:
But again, hard to say if those are problems in these pictures only, or in the full-res ones that you submitted.
Hope that helps,
Michael
_____________
Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, thanks for your quick reply, I'm not sure why the attachments does not seem to be as uploaded. I reviewed my message and the photos seem to be right. I appreciate your opinion, but maybe it will be more helpful if you see the correct photos. is there any other way to show my photos?
Thanks
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
If you insert pictures using the button in the toolbar above, it should be fine.
Michael
_____________
Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
But again, hard to say if those are problems in these pictures only, or in the full-res ones that you submitted.
By @MNiessenPhoto
6000×2500 pixels is not enough? My guess is that that is the picture resolution!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
"6000×2500 pixels is not enough? My guess is that that is the picture resolution!"
I don't see them at that size, clearly. When I click on those pictures, they are displayed at 100% according to the viewer and don't even fill my 4k screen...
Michael
_____________
Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
My guess: The browser display is not accurate.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There is colour banding:
…and the designs are not sharp. If you look at them as “photos”, they are underexposed.
Here the histogram of the read:
and the green one:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm not sure what commercial value these abstracts have as Stock imagery. Even if accepted, it's unlikely to make much in sales. The competition is fierce. Adobe Stock's database already contains millions & millions of high quality backgrounds & wallpapers. See below.
Better luck with your next submission.