I do not undestand why this picture was been rejected for intelectuak property
All the brands marks has been erased
Vegetables are protected by a intelectual property? !!!!
You need to show us the ORIGINAL picture you submitted. This is just a thumbnail, no details are visible, so we cannot check the picture for IP which is small.
Probably because it was taken at a market, and one can see quite clearly it was taken at a market, so this is where the IP comes in. It's the location rather than the veges!
Nobody can see anything at the published size.
The signs probably bear the logo of the market, but until you upload the original, it's impossible to verify.
Most likely, it's all of the signs in the photo
The signs (there are indeed many signs) are made by someone and sold as a product. You can't make a profit selling photos of someone else's product. There is also recognisable branding eg on onions.
First, your editing is really badly done, as you most of times see the editing and repeated pattern.
Second, there are still marks left over, in addition of the nice price tags, that are quite of a specific design:
thanks a lot for all thoses informations
There you go. You still have identifying features in your shot - labeling. And the cloning work could have been done better!
It's a bit messy!
thanks a lot for your informations
avec tous ces zooms au moins on ne pourra pas dire que ma photo était floue ... hihihih
Elle l'était peut-être. Je n'ai pas regardé les autres détails. J'étais sur mon iPad. 😉 C'est plus difficile là de voir la qualité de faire des commentaires à ce sujet. Je n'ai pas les mêmes outils…
thanks a lot for all your answers