Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Greetings!,
I generated an images using generative AI and upscaled it to suit Adobe Stock but it got rejected in moderation. Can anyone please give some inputs on created good quality photos and possible reasons for rejection.
Thanks
Anushk.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I won't comment on the image itself since there is no way sometimes to second guess why some images (whether photos or AI) were rejected. But I will say this. From your post, I get the impression that you submitted just this one image. I would suggest that you upload at least 3 to 7 images daily, because if you are submitting one image at a time, and then posting here to get feedback, it will be months or even years before you have enough images accepted to begin making a profit.
OK, I lied. I will comment on the image. Get rid of the extraneous text surrounding the robot. The point is made within the robot itself. Also, robots created with AI are a dime a dozen. Almost like flowers and sunset photos. Get a feel for what others are doing with AI and then...don't do that. I'll grant you, there is nothing new under the sun, because every time I come up with a concept that I am certain no one has ever done before, it turns out a lot of people have done it before. So keep pushing the bounderies.
AI is easy. But it's also extremely difficult. 99.9% of all AI image results require some degree of editing beyond just upscaling.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Please post the asset as submitted. However, even so, in this file, I see artefacts that will be enhanced when you upscale.
I would get rid of the background and submit this one as a real PNG with the transparent background. And yes, get rid of those AI writings. They are good for nothing. And I also mean those inside the head.
Please note that PNG files are only for files with transparency.
Contrary to common gossips, it is often quite straightforward to identify at least half a dozen issues in the rejected images that are posted here.