Review and Critique

[aurelia123]

I am currently working on a photography project and I need some criticism on it.

[Test Screen Name]

We are able to offer opinions on submissions that were rejected for Adobe stock, not any other kind of project. If Adobe rejected these images, please tell us the exact reasons they gave for each rejection. We could guess but it would be wasting your valuable time for us to guess.

[aurelia123]

Thank you for the insight, much appreciated

[Nancy OShea]

Unsuitable for Stock imagery.  Too dark and ill defined.  B&W doesn't sell.  I can't even guess what the 2nd image is supposed to be.

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in their own commercial projects.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

[aurelia123]

I will keep that in mind, Thank you. The second one is a tortilla though.

[jacquelingphoto2017 · Accepted solution]

Hi @aurelia123 ,

They are all underexposed, noisy and not completely in focus. The third image has a serious white balance issue. None of these are suitable for Adobe stock. If it is that these are not for Adobe stock, please be advised that we are volunteers to critique Adobe stock contributors' files only. 

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

[aurelia123]

Its just that I am a beginner and learning about Stock photography. Thank you for the insight it is really valuable. I need to define the title appropriately.