Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Rifiuto per problemi tecnici

Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSCF9710.jpg

Salve, secondo voi perché questa foto è stata scartata per "problemi tecnici"?

Piergiorgio Greco

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

133

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Adobe Community Professional , Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021
I believe the photo was better before editing. The white balance is wrong. It's too yellowish, the temperature too high. The contrast was set too high. In addition, white was reinforced, so the lights are blown out.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021
Too much saturation, horizon not level, and the birds need to be removed.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Enthusiast , Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021
Besides what has been said, a lot of artifacts in the sky and fringing.The towers are much darker at the top than at the bottom, so I assume there's a gradient filter over the sky.Clearly way overedited.As @Marianne-Deiters said, the photo might have been better before editing.A lot of "tough love" in our answers, but don't be discouraged. Practice makes perfect, as they say Hope that helps,Michael_____________Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I believe the photo was better before editing. The white balance is wrong. It's too yellowish, the temperature too high. The contrast was set too high. In addition, white was reinforced, so the lights are blown out.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Too much saturation, horizon not level, and the birds need to be removed.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSCF9710_1.jpg

Now?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Much better!

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Besides what has been said, a lot of artifacts in the sky and fringing.

MNiessenPhoto_0-1637063138531.png

The towers are much darker at the top than at the bottom, so I assume there's a gradient filter over the sky.

Clearly way overedited.

As @Marianne-Deiters said, the photo might have been better before editing.

A lot of "tough love" in our answers, but don't be discouraged. Practice makes perfect, as they say 😉

Hope that helps,

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

 

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSCF9710_1.jpg

Tank you so much for your advices. Now, what do you think about?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Much better!

It could use some lightening of the shadows and IMO a little sharpening especially on the towers.

Still many birds to remove, too, as they looks like dirt spots. If you zoom in a little, you can clearly see many of them.

MNiessenPhoto_0-1637064781986.png

Hope that helps,

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you. Sorry, what does Imo mean?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

IMO = in my opinion

Nothing technical 😉

 

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This edit is much better. As you did not post the full resolution picture, it is, however, difficult to see some possible defects.

 

I would suggest that you work the whites (right part of the histogram):

 

Abambo_1-1637071394271.png

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSCF9710_2.jpg

This photo is at maximum resolution. Does it work?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That looks great apart from some strange steaks in the sky, moderate (and I think correctable) noise in the background, including the sky. Only the trees to the left are somehow strange. I can't get what happens there. It may well be the difficult sensor for your camera. 

 

I would correct these streaks:

Abambo_0-1637085957623.png

and then put a careful noise reduction on the sky and background and resubmit.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

DSCF9713.jpg

It's very strange, but tihis similar picture has been accepted by Adobe...

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why strange? Vetting is done by humans, and even that Adobe tries to strengthen coherence between different moderators, some moderators are more stringent than others, not to talk about other human factors like mood of the day or time of the day or fatigue of the moderator.

 

This image should have been refused to on the same arguments. But it may also well be that the moderator for your picture one did see something we all did not look for.

 

Comparing both pictures, I think that the second one is a bit less saturated.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Ok, thank you very much!

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You're welcome.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

It's much more natural now.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Even on the "thumbnail" picture that you posted, you have multiple problems. That can't be better with the original resolution picture. Look at your picture at 100% and 200% to see the defects.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Nov 16, 2021 Nov 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you!

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 17, 2021 Nov 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You're welcome!

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines