Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
I recently got reminded during the exam process that I need to fill a right to the image, for an illustration, with a 100% fictive person. How can I avoid this kind of situation?
It doesn't make any sense as the person doesn't exist even in the real life.
Two examples were rejected :
It makes sense, as the moderator does not know, there is no ressemblance with a living person. Submit a property release where you sign as the property holder and the artist ("photographer"), where you declare in the description, that the image is not modeled after a real person.
Moderators need to be on the secure legal side. If they don't know, they will refuse. It's only like that, that a potential buyer get's protected.
BTW: nice work. I love especially the second one. But I would have p
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It makes sense, as the moderator does not know, there is no ressemblance with a living person. Submit a property release where you sign as the property holder and the artist ("photographer"), where you declare in the description, that the image is not modeled after a real person.
Moderators need to be on the secure legal side. If they don't know, they will refuse. It's only like that, that a potential buyer get's protected.
BTW: nice work. I love especially the second one. But I would have preferred seeing the eyes wide open, as with the first one.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you for your answer Abambo, I'll follow your advice!
I have a version with the eyes open, but I'm not yet convinced of the quality of the eyes, still work to do on it so, thank you for your encouragement!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're welcome. Please update this if you need further advice.