Seek for constructive criticism

[arnok75155199]

First of all, as a beginner I hope I use this forum correctly...

If so, I seek for guidance whether you think the attached picture is fit for purpose. I posted another version which was rejected because of artifacts. However, this was for good reason, I have to admit. Now I produced the picture paying more attention to noise, clear color and no artifacts such as sensor spots.

I would be inte3rsted in your feedback whether you believe this version is compliant with Adobe technical standards or where you still see flaws (there are still very tine halos around the posts of the bridge when zooming in)

thanks and regards

Arno

[joanH]

Dear New Adobe Stock contributor. Welcome and best wishes. It will serve you well to go to the beginners guidelines to Adobe Stock Guidelines for you. Here you will learn what is acceptable and is not. You will benefit by looking at your work at 100 to 200% magnification where all the small flaws are exposed. Best regards, JH    

I do enjoy this photo but it is not up to Adobe Standards just yet. FIx and resubmit.

You can find information similar to guidance you  request at this link: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/rejection-reasons.html

Reasons for content rejection

[arnok75155199]

Hi,

can you give me one or two examples where you see flaws to be corrected so I get a feeling where the „threshold“ is

thanks

Arno

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

Von: joanh22203655

Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2018 23:34

An: Arno Kratky

Betreff: Seek for constructive criticism

Seek for constructive criticism

created by joanh22203655 in Stock Contributor Critique - View the full discussion

Dear New Adobe Stock contributor. Welcome and best wishes. It will serve you well to go to the beginners guidelines to Adobe Stock Guidelines for you. Here you will learn what is acceptable and is not. You will benefit by looking at your work at 100 to 200% magnification where all the small flaws are exposed. Best regards, JH    

I do enjoy this photo but it is not up to Adobe Standards just yet. FIx and resubmit.

You can find information similar to guidance you  request at this link: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/rejection-reasons.html

Reasons for content rejection

If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/10532201#10532201 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer

Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:

Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/10532201#10532201

To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"

Start a new discussion in Stock Contributor Critique by email or at Adobe Community

For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

This email was sent by Adobe Community because you are a registered user.

You may unsubscribe instantly from Adobe Community, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences

---

Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.

http://www.avg.com

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Welcome to the forum. This is a nice sharp image. I believe there might be a technical problem. In my opinion, I believe the image is a little too close, I believe you should have included more of the road. This is what I think. However what I think is not final. What Adobe thinks is. What I am really saying is we might tell you there is an issue, when Adobe do not consider what we see a major one; or we might tell you there's none when Adobe finds many. To learn what is really required, the best to do is read all the guidelines you find. Follow them according to your understanding and submit. If there are rejections, depending on what rejection there is, if you are unable to identify the reason for rejection, then the forum will be able to help you to identify where the issue is. The link Joanh post is a good one. Also you need to read all the links on tagproducts_SG_STOCK-CONTRIBUTOR_i18nKeyHelppagetitle , especially the Adobe Contributor Guide document. At the end of the document, are some very important links also.

All the best

JG

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

Here are some examples that you have to be careful of avoiding. Adobe may reject it based on the following.

I think you have over-sharpened a bit. Notice some halos around the edges of the bridge:

This is an indication of over-sharpening.

I think you have used a bit too much noise reduction. The result is detail is being lost and you get a smudgy appearance - a bit like a painting:

Also take note of the edges here as well.

You have some other problems also:

In the sky area you have some black flecks - artifacts maybe?

These were viewed at 108% in photoshop.

Compositionally, I tend to agree with Jacquelin - that you need more space at the bottom.

By the way - yes, you have used this forum exactly for its intended purpose.

[joanH]

Excellent and useful reply - rickey336 and jacquelingphoto2017  - together we cover most of the

useful information. Nice.! JH

[arnok75155199]

Hi ricky336,

many thanks for your efforts to Point out some examples, These are extremely helpful to me. Seems I have to work on the right balance for noise reduction, sometimes I do too less, sometimes I do too much-. Also appreciate your and Jaqueline’s comment on composition, very helpful indeed

best regards

Arno

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

Von: ricky336

Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018 08:23

An: Arno Kratky

Betreff: Seek for constructive criticism

Seek for constructive criticism

created by ricky336 in Stock Contributor Critique - View the full discussion

Hello,

Here are some examples that you have to be careful of avoiding. Adobe may reject it on the bases of the following.

I think you have over-sharpened a bit. Notice some halos around the edges of the bridge:

https://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-10532851-1538937/crop2.jpg

This is an indication of over-sharpening.

I think you have used a bit too much noise reduction. The result is detail is being lost and you get a smudgy appearance - a bit like a painting:

https://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-10532851-1538938/crop1.jpg

Also take note of the edges here as well.

You have some other problems also:

https://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-10532851-1538948/crop3.jpg

In the sky area you have some black flecks - artifacts maybe?

These were viewed at 108% in photoshop.

Compositionally, I tend to agree with Jacquelin - that you need more space at the bottom.

By the way - yes, you have used this forum exactly for its intended purpose.

If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/10532851#10532851 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer

Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:

Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/10532851#10532851

To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"

Start a new discussion in Stock Contributor Critique by email or at Adobe Community

For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.

This email was sent by Adobe Community because you are a registered user.

You may unsubscribe instantly from Adobe Community, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences

---

Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.

http://www.avg.com