Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Technical Issues rejection

New Here ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello, Could I get some more info please

Thanks in advance

1)

yiDv-LQNn0A.jpg

 2)

WnYMiqjvFlc.jpg

3)

roxHyZrcB_E.jpg

 4)

K6Hoer-ni2g.jpg

 5)

hDPNqOHtvdw.jpg

 6)

dvRU8aRT-Rs.jpg

 7)

cpP1OJKmx88.jpg

 8)

3O5W-20CXS0.jpg

 9)

_JAoaMLa2P0.jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique, Troubleshooting

Views

67

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As you may know, photos are checked in full detail for technical faults at 100% to 200%. Many faults cannot be seen if the image is reduced. Please post 1-3 (max) images at full size.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

How do you think that we can detect the errors on a picture if we do not get the full resolution images? And then, posting one or two pictures would help you to detect the errors yourself by examining the faults highlighted by the experts.

1. underexposed, has optical errors and compression artefacts. But it is not clear if those artefacts have been introduced by downsampling and compressing for here. Sharpness cannot be assessed.

2. & 3: not possible to check

4. Shadows are underexposed and are missing dynamics. You will need model releases from the people in view.

5. Photographing in the sun is very difficult and needs some post-processing. You probably have optical defects like chromatic aberration. The foreground is underexposed. Model releases needed.

6. Correct the highlight on the apple, and you have probably artefacts in the background. It looks like a fake DOF. That never works right for the moment for the quality needed for stock images.

7. Not sharp, even as a miniature.

8. Washed out colours and probably also underexposed. Other artefacts are possible.

9. Chromatic aberration is even visible on your miniature.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Oct 21, 2021 Oct 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hello,

A number of issues:

  • exposure
  • white balance
  • composition 

You have to think about the commercial viability of these shots. Can they sell? What would a buyer do with these? How could they use these images to sell something, or how do they create a concept?

They are  'snapshots' rather than having a practical usage I think.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines