Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Technical Issues

New Here ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can some one please explain why this photo was rejected for Stock contribution because of tecnical issues

i have had the same reply for many of my photos and would like to know what i need to do to correct this 

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

162

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

LEGEND , Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021
We can only use our experience to guess. Other people with more skills than I may see different problems, but I observe the composition could, in my opinion, be improved. People may want to do their own cropping and may want to see more of the dog, but the most serious composition issue is that you do not have the very top of the head in the shot. The one absolute stopper is you've signed the picture. Did you ever see an advert with the photographer's signature...?

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021
Hello, Apart from the signature, I see you've tried to recover the highlights on the dog's fur, but in doing so, you've ended up with a grey dull area! Exposure could be improved. Also, I think you've too tightly framed the dog, so I agree with TSN about the composition. Give the dog more room to move.

Likes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

We can only use our experience to guess. Other people with more skills than I may see different problems, but I observe the composition could, in my opinion, be improved. People may want to do their own cropping and may want to see more of the dog, but the most serious composition issue is that you do not have the very top of the head in the shot. The one absolute stopper is you've signed the picture. Did you ever see an advert with the photographer's signature...?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

At first I thought the purple tongue was a color balance issue but I now realize that's a typical Chow trait.

 

I think TSN nailed the #1 rejection reason:  signature watermark.  Try removing signature and resubmit.

 

Good luck!

 

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

There are also completely blown out areas on the right and left side of the dogs head.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hello,

Apart from the signature, I see you've tried to recover the highlights on the dog's fur, but in doing so, you've ended up with a grey dull area!

InkedCA1A0662_LI.jpg

Exposure could be improved.

Also, I think you've too tightly framed the dog, so I agree with TSN about the composition. Give the dog more room to move.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines