The attached image was not approved. Why is that? help me

[dekerd_6605]

The attached image was not approved. Why is that? help me    

[Abambo]

What was the refusal reason? Quality issues?

[Abambo]

Your first: the eyes are not sharp, portraits need sharp eyes.

Your third:

massive rendering errors:

In this condition, the plane is unable to land.

Your last picture has “snow” issues and then, typical for generative AI, issues with knobs and similar:

(cloud: this texture is not what I expect from out of focus elements)

(also Look at the zip)

And then:

Did you notice the different ear jewels? Well, that may become a trend with generative AI 🙂 .

And as we are checking inconstancies, you AI did gift the poor woman different earlobes.

[Abambo]

I've forgotten: your second:

artefacts in the whiskers, and surrounding:

[RALPH_L]

[daniellei4510]

[Jill_C]

The floating bokeh balls don't make sense. Bokeh is created from a light source, ant there is no light source behind these. This is a frequent flaw in AI drawings.

[daniellei4510]

I just noticed on the woman in the black coat. It has an unnecessary and illogical zipper at the bottom.

[Abambo]

I just noticed on the woman in the black coat. It has an unnecessary and illogical zipper at the bottom.

By @daniellei4510

...and it's full of artefacts. 😉

[Nancy OShea]

Given all the AI mistakes, these were rejected for Quality Issues.

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects. Nothing less will sell.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html