• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

The "curators" at Adobe stock!

New Here ,
Feb 10, 2022 Feb 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hmm....the "curators" on adobe rejected this image for "technical" reasons. This very same image sold last December at Blue Ocean Archives for $630.00US (one time use).

220_F_473829089_BWCC47xgo2BXguFXOlvHlO77InTGJ0AZ.jpg

 

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors

Views

153

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 10, 2022 Feb 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If you wish the community members to provide an opinion on what the technical issues might be, you'll have to upload the identical full-size image that you submitted to Adobe Stock.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2022 Feb 11, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Joseph22332042k0bh ,

Just because you enjoyed some success with an image at another microstock agency doesn't necessarily mean it's the right fit for Adobe Stock.   Different agencies have different quality and content standards as well as different customer base. 

 

As @Jill_C said,  there is too little detail and resolution in a thumbnail for us to judge.  But what little there is doesn't look like anything I could use in a commercial project because the content is clipped on all sides.

 

In any case, read your Stock Contributor User Guide carefully.  And compare your work with that of other Stock contributors in your keyword category.  Adobe Stock evaluates all submissions fairly based on the same criteria, regardless of experience and equipment.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 11, 2022 Feb 11, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Congratulations for your 630$ sale, but that does not mean your asset fulfills the Adobe requirements. Did you check the technical issues requirements? You should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 16, 2022 Feb 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi @Joseph22332042k0bh,

The photo is very tiny for accurate analysis. However, what I see is a noisy photo of which the main subject, the insects, is out of focus.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines