Want to know specific reason(s) for rejection of my first work.

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

Hi, I am looking ofr the specific reason for rejection of my work. i am a bigginer and i think i will improve if i can have the specific mistakes that i made in my work. please help me.

[Jill_C]

Very blurry and grainy. Harsh lighting 

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

Got it. thank you. 

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

You should post the original that you submitted.

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

Hi Ralph, this is the one I have submitted. apart from this there are two more which got rejected but I posted here only one thinking one is enough to know the reason. 🙂

[Test Screen Name]

This can't be the original you submitted. It has an Adobe Stock watermark. We need the actual file you sent to Adobe, which they rejected. Not the file you see in your contributor account. 
Also, Adobe give a reason already. What did they say?

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

Hi, yeah I mean this is the the image that I have submitted then they sent me reply with this image. This the same I guess apart from water mark there is no difference or is it the way they want I am confused now. 🙂 Anyways thay gave me the reasons in general according to their policies and mentioned if I want konw the specific reason please post here. So i did. even I tried to take few images of beer but it didn't came right, I am not gonna submit them but looking to learn more. Thank you. 

[Henrik Heigl · Accepted solution]

Hi,

the Image "unnamed.jpg" that you have postet here is not the same Picture you have Uploded to your Contributor Account. Its a reprocessed version that came back automaticaly. To analyse YOUR Original Picture we need the ORIGINAL Picture that you have Uploaded that also would have not been named "Unnamed" (another indication). If we would look at this Picture what we can actually see here we the dimensions would be way to small, it has be processed in a different way as you would do it, etc. So other to say that it seem to be blurry, unsharp and the Highlights maybe blown out (what must be the same for the Original) not much more could be said. So you see if you want more and specifics you also have to give us the possibility to look at the original closely.

Also before you submit, please review the submission guidelines carefully and compare your work with other Stock inventory.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Hope that helps.

[Test Screen Name · Accepted solution]

Adobe look at every pixel of your image at 200%. You need to do the same, so do we if we are to give a quality review. The watermark image cannot be used for this check. 

Also please tell us the ACTUAL reason Adobe gave you. Please don't give a summary, every detail matters. Copy/paste please. 

In general, please do as we ask, even if you don't necessarily see why?? Only that way can we give you the best help. 

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

I got it. I mentioned both images reason given by Adobe and original image without watermark. hope to see improvements in my work by using your suggestions. 

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

The technical quality is not sufficient for commercial use. See screenshots.

Poor focus

Light glare & rough edges

Focus & water spot.

Read these links:

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Better luck with your next submission. 🙂

[Sachin28351640v9xd]

Thank you. 

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

You should use a tripod and better lighting for this kind of still life. A tripod will allow you to use a higher f-stop and longer exposure. Also, the background needs to be immaculate, dust and hair-free, because the camera will reveal every flaw. The composition is a bit awkward, making it difficult to comprehend the message.

[Abambo]

Despite what @Test Screen Name wrote, "Quality Issues" is what we want to read from you as the refusal reason. Refusal reasons are quite generic, but they indicate what troubles the moderator saw. There can be one or more reasons, why a picture will not pass, but the moderator refuses on the first error they see, and that will be your given reason. 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html