Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi My illustration was rejected by adobe stock images. It only stated quality issues. Vague. I want to get better and improve. Can some one give me constructive criticism please. Thx
[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]
The numbers on the clock are wrong for starts. Plus a mix of arabic and roman.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The numbers on the clock are wrong for starts. Plus a mix of arabic and roman.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The mix of numbers and Roman numerals was intentional, whimsical even. That's the point. But I think the little dots on the balls are fine.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The moderators will not see it that way. 😉
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
can we upload images in png format even if they don't have transparent background?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
NO!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi My illustration was rejected by adobe stock images. It only stated quality issues. Vague. I want to get better and improve. Can some one give me constructive criticism please. Thx
By @Alaska Dawn 907
All refusals are generic. They won't tell you precisely why they refused your asset, but this asset has different issues.
Gradient shows banding; border is not wanted:
The line is an error:
And even if it is intentional, your clock looks weird and is not correct. Except if you are a very highly known concept artist, you should abstain from such “intentional” errors. Especially, if you contribute to stock.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Weird...as in strange and unnatural. A perfectly legitimate critique under the circumstances.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Know who your customers are and give THEM what they want. Realistic images sell better than silly ones.
Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects. A $100,000 ad campaign can't afford anything less. Read your Stock Contributor Guide for more tips.
Good luck.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm sorry, but Salvator Dali's clocks look perferctly fine for me. They were just gotten liquified. Your clock looks wrong. As I said, if you would be a very famous artist, you could probably sell such a creation. BTW: I said the clock is weird, not the illustration, that is a huge difference. And my remarks were civil. You should accept critique.
Banding: if it is a pixel image, you need to redo the gradiant.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Got it ok.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your clock has 11 numbers instead of 12. The roman numbers are mixed up. For example you have 8 at the top instead of 12. The numbers are not correctly arranged geometrically. I believe it would be better having the arabic and roman numerals alternate.
You need to zoom in and take a close look at your drawing. There are numerous errors. The patters are flying off all the balls. This is one example:
The line going in this circle do not appear to be a solid line. Plus, the other section of the patten with the line do not seem to be properly aligned.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, you can re-edit and resubmit rejected images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Alaska Dawn 907 ,
You are welcome. You can recreate or edit the same drawing and resubmit.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
VII, VIII, IX, and X represent 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 respectively. After 10, the roman numerals are followed by XI for 11, XII for 12, XII for 13, … till XX for 20.
I do not have Roman numera for 8 at the top. I am missing the 7 though. Thanks for pointing things out. I will retry.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Alaska Dawn 907 ,
I know what you are trying to represent. i state it as I see it. As I said in my reply "The numbers are not correctly arranged geometrically". Therefore, I see IIX instead of XII. And yes, 8 is VIII, but 12 is still not IIX.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Roman numbers are not easy to read, but this should help: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Abambo ,
I am assuming you are replying to my post. I have no problem reading roman numeral once it is printed correctly. I am highlighting that the numbering in the clock face is not correctly done. @Alaska Dawn 907 needs to look at a clock face to see how it is done. The orientation of the clock numbers, be it Arabic or roman numerals is incorrect. They don't turn right.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The idea of generating and creating an image of a clock is not bad, but the execution of the AI leaves much to be desired, especially regarding numbers and letters. Some AI generators are specifically designed for portraits; for object illustrations like this, a specialized AI tailored for such purposes should be used. In the past, I also tried to upload images of clocks, and I realized that they would be rejected from the start because the AI would either get a letter or a number wrong, rendering the image invalid.
As far as I know, the AI cannot piece together those numbers and letters correctly; it places them randomly and out of order, taking a number from one clock and a letter from another, and thus tries to create a new clock. The problem is that it’s not like with portraits, where you can merge multiple images, because here you cannot afford to make mistakes regarding the technical aspects of the clock.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Just curious what Ai generator is good for portraits?
By @Alaska Dawn 907
=============
Aragon AI, Picsart, DaVinci, PhotoSonic & Portrait Pal are a few that do head-shots. There are probably others...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied