Copy link to clipboard
Copied
deer: lacks details, strong color noise.
bird: sharpened too much, JPEG artefacts.
blue sky: Too dark in the shadows, artifacts, too saturated blues.
green field: lacks details, too saturated greens.
the way: color fringes, lacks details.
If you provide the general reason, then you will be provided with a specific reason… 🙂
We are contributors, and it's not possible for us to look into your account.
None of your deer is in focus, you have many many artefacts. Oversaturated.
(seen at 100%)
Your bird is out of focus and the picture contains many many artefacts, oversaturated:
(seen at 100%)
Guess what about "blue way": Out of focus, many artefacts.
Green Feild (Field?): Heavily oversaturated, out of focus, many artefacts. In a
...The deer have way to much edit effects. The photo is too soft which leaves nothing in focus. The shadows are too dark.
The bird is over sharpened which results in posterization on the background.
Blue Way is too blue and not natural. There are artifacts in the sky and a halo around the mountains. The sun is overexposed and the shadows are underexposed.
Green Field is too green and yellow. The focus is not good and there are artifacts around the people. You also need at least one model release i
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
deer: lacks details, strong color noise.
bird: sharpened too much, JPEG artefacts.
blue sky: Too dark in the shadows, artifacts, too saturated blues.
green field: lacks details, too saturated greens.
the way: color fringes, lacks details.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you provide the general reason, then you will be provided with a specific reason… 🙂
We are contributors, and it's not possible for us to look into your account.
None of your deer is in focus, you have many many artefacts. Oversaturated.
(seen at 100%)
Your bird is out of focus and the picture contains many many artefacts, oversaturated:
(seen at 100%)
Guess what about "blue way": Out of focus, many artefacts.
Green Feild (Field?): Heavily oversaturated, out of focus, many artefacts. In addition you would need model releases from the people in the picture.
(seen at 100%)
The way: Oversaturated, probably wrong white balance, no focus, artefacts, chromatic aberration.
(seen at 100%)
I'm sorry to say, but none of your pictures shows even a hint of acceptability. The refusal reason was "Technical issues" and the moderator had an easy point with this.
You really should read the requirements before submitting again. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for sharing.
Kindly also advise the 100% ratio dimention for normal image as its look like zooming the picture and take a snapshot of deer and most of the images are looks like cropping the images.
Please share the techinal dimention of images as after zooming every images will be blure.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The deer have way to much edit effects. The photo is too soft which leaves nothing in focus. The shadows are too dark.
The bird is over sharpened which results in posterization on the background.
Blue Way is too blue and not natural. There are artifacts in the sky and a halo around the mountains. The sun is overexposed and the shadows are underexposed.
Green Field is too green and yellow. The focus is not good and there are artifacts around the people. You also need at least one model release if not more.
The way is out of focus. Again the white balance is off. The highlights are overexposed and there is a purple touch to the highlighted areas.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
By the way, Adobe will only ever give a general message when rejecting, like "Artefacts", "IP violation" or "Technical issues". They will NOT give more information; there is no option to discuss or appeal. This would take time, and it is more cost effective for Adobe to process images at high speed without explanation, and just press a button to reject.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Agreed but what we need to take care as rejection is higher which is good qulity images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
An experienced contributor can analyse the rejection by him- or herself. But you need to read the contributor manual and then take that into account.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Shubhuborad,
Adobe has a system that will efficiently expedite the processing of millions of images each day. The review moderators gives the category of rejection. The critique community consisting of ACPs and others that identify all the flaws we can find for you to decide to correct or discard the file.
Best wishes
Jacquelin
Copy link to clipboard
Copied