#1 isn't sharp, has competely blown out sky and chromatic aberration (green and purple fringes)
#2 isn't sharp, trees are dark and sky is blown out, a lot of noise and other artifacts
#3 many artifacts in the sky. It also looks like you applied too much sharpening to try to get some details in the buildings
#4 not sharp, many artifacts in the background. Petals blown out: just pure yellow without any details.
Hope that helps,
Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator
thank you very. it help very much to improve my editing 🙂
They are all very noisy, not sharp to the point of being blurry, and have severe artifacts. The one with the bee has a large distraction on the left.
Hi @Rana5C12 ,
You should be a little bit critical about your pictures. Stock needs naturally looking pictures. Do you really expect a buyer being happy with such false and clipped colours?
Or pictures with such flagrant artefacts?
Not to talk about the missing detail!
And this one, seen at 100 % looks like a digital zoom picture:
None of your pictures even comes near to the quality required for stock. I do not know how you created these pictures, but the quality is probably one of the worst I've seen for a long time. Please check the manual before submitting your next pictures:
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html