Why rejected

[Jean Luc24200150aw1s]

Hi,

Can one of you let me know why these 3 pictures have been rejected?
Id 1243434137, 1243432639 and 1242781240.
Thanks a lot!
JL

[RALPH_L · Accepted solution]

You need to upload the images here for us to review them.

[Jean Luc24200150aw1s · Accepted solution]

Here are the 3 rejected pictures.
Thanks to let me know why they have been rejected.
Kind regards,
JL

[Abambo]

Your first: contrast, and you will need to edit out or reconstruct the unreadable sign.

your second: you will need a model realease 

besides quality issues like the exposure, chromatic aberration...

Your third: at a first sight, I would guess that the asset is underexposed.

(btw: Adobe returns a refusal reason, you should tell us that reason)

[Jean Luc24200150aw1s]

OK merci pour ces précisions.
Je vais réviser les réglages.
Pour les "modèles", comme personne n'est reconnaissable, je ne pensais pas
que c'était nécessaire.
La raison était bien "pb de qualité".
Merci encore!
JL

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Pour les "modèles", comme personne n'est reconnaissable, je ne pensais pas que c'était nécessaire.
By @Jean Luc24200150aw1s

Si cela serait moi, je m'aurais reconnu. 

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

Underexposed - the snow shouldn't be gray. There is very noticeable chromatic aberration along the legs of the skier.

[Abambo]

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Abambo]

Hi,

Can one of you let me know why these 3 pictures have been rejected?
Id 1243434137, 1243432639 and 1242781240.
Thanks a lot!
JL

By @Jean Luc24200150aw1s

Because of quality issues I guess.