No WE didn't. Adobe did.
The experienced folk here can sometimes help photographers understand Adobe's rejections. If you want that, please share 1-3 (no more) pics. They MUST be the original pics. Do nott reduce them or resave them; we've got to view them at 200% just like Adobe do.
instead of a screen shot, post the originals so that we can review them.
Sometimes, beautiful photos don't make for technically perfect photos. I also look forward to seeing the details of these 🙂
It looks like you used excessive filtering given by your screenshot. This can have an impact on quality as mentioned in the rejection reason!
One man's trash is another man's treasure. 🙂
Without seeing the full size images, no one here can give proper feedback. My guess is the technical issues are related to focus, lighting, color balance and filtering but that's just a wild guess based on teeny, tiny preview thumbnails.
Meanwhile, you can read these links from your Stock Contributor User Guide. And then closely examine your images at 100-300% magnification. Evaluate your images as if you are a customer, not the photographer. Would you buy these? What would you use them for commercially -- color prints on calendars, t-shirts, tote bags, posters, TV commercials, etc...?
Hope that helps.
I think that even with those small thumbnails, I see some quality issues. Rejections are part of the life as a stock photographer. You need to learn to interpret the rejections for avoiding them. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html