Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
I was guessing if it's possible to dispute a rejected photography file (or more...), which appear from my side fully appropriate (as exemple : intelectual property rejected for a skyline view of a city or for a non-blur photography - shot with a 5D - rejected for blur...) ?
Few exemple of intelectual property (is it me ? or it's not legal anymore to shoot a city ?) - screenshot from rejected -
For a blur effect (is it me again ??!) - I add the original file - :
There is no dispute process, except that you may post pictures here and experts will look into them and advice. They are (normally) standard experienced contributors, but from time to time there are also Adobe people giving advice.
The castle: if that is the original file than it's indeed not sharp:
As for the IP:
All your pictures are too small to look at, but please check for logos on the buildings (or on the ship...).
Also if you use tradenames either in the keywords or the title, the pict
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There is no dispute process, except that you may post pictures here and experts will look into them and advice. They are (normally) standard experienced contributors, but from time to time there are also Adobe people giving advice.
The castle: if that is the original file than it's indeed not sharp:
As for the IP:
All your pictures are too small to look at, but please check for logos on the buildings (or on the ship...).
Also if you use tradenames either in the keywords or the title, the picture gets also refused.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Ok you are right, I'll check that (from my point of view it's not a log issue, more a building for intelectual property, maybe in key words) Thank you for your answer 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied