Does anyone know why these images has been rejected ?? For techinal issues

[myles5EF9]

all of my 18 images where rejected as somone who is a noobie to this website well techinal issuess is a very broad term could some verteran help me out thanks.

[RALPH_L]

All of your photos except the steel cover have a depth of field problem. The main subjects are not all focused. The steel cover is mainly a ownership problem. You cannot show any identifiable ownership markings. 

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @myles5EF9 ,

The white balance of all your photos are incorrect. They are all too cool. The last image is totally out of focus. The others depth of field is shallow or they were shot from too close a range, thus parts of the subjects are not focused.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

[Nancy OShea]

Put yourself in the customer's shoes.  Would you buy these images?  What would you use them for?

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in their own projects.  See links below.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Better luck with your next submission. 🙂

[ricky336]

Hello,

Technical issues is rather an umbrella term that covers quite a lot. Read the links to get an overview of how Adobe classifies it.

You should also think about the commercial value of these. Personally, I don't think they have any, so another rejection reason is the lack of aesthetic and commercial appeal.

Stock photography is commercial-based! Commercial being the keyword!