• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Help with not accepted files.

New Here ,
Feb 10, 2021 Feb 10, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can anyone give me any pointers to the rather vague generic reason for the two pictures attached?  They are 2 pano's the second one was my first attempt at a 180 degree milky way pano. so any tips would be much appreciated.

Surely the reviewer can give a more discriptive reason than "Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, during our review we found that it contains one or more technical issues, so we can't accept it into our collection."

DSC05911-Pano-2.jpg(138) Tarn Hows Pano 180 (DSC05846).jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

183

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 10, 2021 Feb 10, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Alan5FE9 ,

Your shots are nice except for being underexposed. Too much details are lost in the black areas. Also there is color noise in the water of the first image, and color fringing around the edges of the white spot of the second image. Please zoom to 100% to inspect your photos.

Best wishes

JG

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 11, 2021 Feb 11, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi Thanks for the kind feedback,

Yea that was a very dark night & I was trying to get Mars & the big dipper in the same pano unfortunately there was a lot of dark forground in the way! & I mistook the color noise for reflected clouds

As for the second image I assumed that the glow around the white spot (star) was due to cloud glow similar to a moon halo!

Thanks again

Alan

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 01, 2021 Mar 01, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The dark areas don't disturb, but the noise does. You need to do a correct noise reduction to get this accepted.

 

The second picture is also strange, as trees don't grow sidewards. In the first picture you see clearly the reflection and that is OK.

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Mar 01, 2021 Mar 01, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Abambo Thanks for the input,

I cropped quite a bit of the foreground out in the first picture & resubmitted it & it was accepted.

As for the second picture that is my first attempt at a 180 degree panorama of the Milky way arching over head hence the trees looking like they are growing sideways! I could have put the picture in portrait orientation but then one sid of the picture the trees would appear to be groing upside down? 

Thanks again 

Alan

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines