I am a new contributer, all my files were rejected due to possible "technical issues".

[PAULINE5FBD]

I use Photoshop to upload and edit, what DPI do I use?  I uploaded at 350 DPI and wondering if that was a problem.

[PAULINE5FBD]

[Guest]

Moving to the Stock Contributors forum from Photoshop

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

The DPI vaue is absolutly nonsense. It's only useful for print operators in a very narrow field of application. You can simply ignore this paramenter as a photographer. There is no difference in image quality between 2 dpi and 100,000 dpi. Digital images are defined by the resolution in pixels and here you have a range you need to meet to be able to upload.

Your image, however is missing detail. There is a kind of flattening that I haven't seen until now. A contrast boost would enhance the worse, but as there is absolutly no structure at the bottom of the waterfall, that does not safe the image.

[Nancy OShea]

Adobe Stock looks for highest visual and technical quality. See links below.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[ricky336]

Dots Per Inch - DPI. Used in printing.  Uploading to stock is irrelevant. The printer can choose what resolution they want.

As mentioned by Abambo, the waterfall is burnt out at the base - no detail. Doesn't look good when enlarged.

The foliage near the top and bottom could also be a problem.