• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Image rejected: Aestethic appearance of image

Community Beginner ,
Jan 24, 2017 Jan 24, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This image has been rejected. Similar images have been accepted an I have already sold.20110616-1445-3SC_2358.jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

438

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Participant , Jan 24, 2017 Jan 24, 2017

Hi Martin,  Aesthetic is always a judgment call. The problems could be.:. The large unfocused houses/scenery in the back ground which draw my eye powerfully away from the arrow.  The arrow appears drawn with uneven stripes making it awkward, The whole image is rotated out of line clockwise and lines up better if rotated counter clockwise (just a bit).

Votes

Translate

Translate
Participant ,
Jan 24, 2017 Jan 24, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi Martin,  Aesthetic is always a judgment call. The problems could be.:. The large unfocused houses/scenery in the back ground which draw my eye powerfully away from the arrow.  The arrow appears drawn with uneven stripes making it awkward, The whole image is rotated out of line clockwise and lines up better if rotated counter clockwise (just a bit).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 25, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey Martin,

as Richard already mentioned, esthetic is a jugment call. I agree with the decision of the moderator. While the composition is interesting, I don't see much commercial appeal here. I'm not sure who would buy the image and if they did, what the image would be used for.

Regards

Stephanie

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 25, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you. I understand; it's your party ...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Participant ,
Jan 27, 2017 Jan 27, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I don't think it was rejected only for aesthetic appeal (however you spell it!)

Your DOF is very narrow on that shot Martin. For example, while I don't have any problems at all with the scenery in the background being out of focus (it should be), it bothers me that the grass on top of the wall is out.

Screen Shot 2017-01-27 at 16.32.04.png

The wall, including its vegetation, is the focus of the image and you should have a DOF that allows for at least a couple of feet of focus so that the grass is in too.

It would also have helped the bottom left to be more in focus although I suspect there may be camera shake involved here.

Screen Shot 2017-01-27 at 16.31.57.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines