image rejected technical issues?

New Here ,
Jan 10, 2021 Jan 10, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi  all. My images were rejected as on one or more technical issues. Can someone tell me the reason for below images.

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

181

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct Answer

Adobe Community Professional , Jan 19, 2021 Jan 19, 2021
The "Suzuki" image, besides having a logo in plain view, which will not get accepted at all, even if Suzuki would sign an ip release, is extremly noisy.  In addition you see sensor or lens dust.  The Susuki image would get accepted as illustrative editorial however, if presented without technical faults or other troubles. The second picture, besides havin a watermark in, it also is framed wich is alsow not allowed. If you look at the image at 100%, you will see that the image carries a lot of no...

Likes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Jan 10, 2021 Jan 10, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Someone more expert than me can probably help you discover the technical issues. Your photos must be to the highest professional standards. One however has a signature: this is forbidden, of course: did you ever see a million dollar advert with the photographer's signature? The rules clearly forbid this. The other will need an IP release from Suzuki.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jan 19, 2021 Jan 19, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The "Suzuki" image, besides having a logo in plain view, which will not get accepted at all, even if Suzuki would sign an ip release, is extremly noisy.  In addition you see sensor or lens dust.  The Susuki image would get accepted as illustrative editorial however, if presented without technical faults or other troubles.

The second picture, besides havin a watermark in, it also is framed wich is alsow not allowed. If you look at the image at 100%, you will see that the image carries a lot of noise. 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jan 19, 2021 Jan 19, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

View your photos at 100% or more.

The first photo: 

  • too much  noisey in the dark areas. You need to do noise reduction.
  • the motor logo needs to be removed.

The secnd photo:

  • the signature needs to be removed.
  • the dark green pile, left of the small bird should be removed.
  • the dark water needs noise reduction.
Best regards, Ralph Lear
Software Engineer and Outdoor Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines