Just curious, I like this image that was rejected for "lack of aesthetics or commercial appeal" of a rocky path through a river bluff.

New Here ,
Jun 14, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

IMG_0045.JPGbl

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

201

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more

Just curious, I like this image that was rejected for "lack of aesthetics or commercial appeal" of a rocky path through a river bluff.

New Here ,
Jun 14, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

IMG_0045.JPGbl

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

202

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Jun 14, 2017 0
Szalam LATEST
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jun 14, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Remember, you approach this image with your memories of the place. You know what it looked like, smelled like, where you were going, and what was around the corner. Somebody just looking at this image doesn't have those associations. Without them, it's a dull image.

As far as the aesthetics go, it's not a very visually interesting image. There is no point of interest in the photo composition. It just looks like an un-composed shot of some flat ground and some uninteresting rocks with some faded graffiti on them. Plus the sky is blown out.

As far as commercial appeal goes, can you think of a reason why someone would purchase this image? It's not immediately obvious that there is a path or trail, so nobody is going to use it for a trail metaphor. The rocks and trees aren't the focus of the image and aren't particularly interesting anyway.

Does that make sense?

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 14, 2017 1