Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Where is the problem with identifiable people? Is the graphics on the T shirt the only problem?
I'd guess it'd be the property release for the dogs if anything, but I haven't had any dogs rejected on my account yet. If it truly is a model release issue, it's got to be her partial face. I'd agree that you can't identify her by what is shown, however, I can't blame Adobe for favoring the safe side on the matter. People are lawsuit happy these days
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You can see part of her face! (Her ears for example) That could be the problem!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for your opinion. I agree that part of her face is showing. she is postally the only peon who who'd recognize her ear. I will black out the T and extend the shirttail to cover and faces. Will resubmit and see what happens next go round.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That might do the trick, - I don't think the dogs would need a model release - possibly a property release
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I wonder if a paw print would count as a signature? Ummm, Just noticed though, the logo on the socks, bottom left...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Surely you don't need a model release for the dogs, right? It must be the shirt...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'd guess it'd be the property release for the dogs if anything, but I haven't had any dogs rejected on my account yet. If it truly is a model release issue, it's got to be her partial face. I'd agree that you can't identify her by what is shown, however, I can't blame Adobe for favoring the safe side on the matter. People are lawsuit happy these days