Picture Rejected

Community Beginner ,
May 24, 2021 May 24, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why this picture is rejected

TOPICS
Contributors

Views

115

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 24, 2021 May 24, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You always need to give us the refusal reason.

 

Here you have, however, a high level of noise. In addition, the picture is not really sharp (shake?).

Abambo_0-1621862039803.png

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
May 24, 2021 May 24, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

but the picture is sharp, pixels will bust for any image if we zoom it more than required?

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 25, 2021 May 25, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Pictures need to be sharp at 100% view magnification, this one isn't sharp around the eyes, but effectively there was no shake. The noise is, however, real and a problem. Noise and other artefacts are best appreciated at  100% and 200%, sometimes even 300%. 

 

Just as a reminder: you did not tell us the rjection reason.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
May 24, 2021 May 24, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

In the upper part of the animal's head, there is a very sharp contour line without a smooth transition of the shadow. A green leaf with sharp irregular contours is the second confirmation of rough processing. Here has been applied (Fill) - (Selections with fill based on content). Usually, after that you need to remove color noise and graininess.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 25, 2021 May 25, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

As a guess, I would say rejected for technical issues. There is a magenta cast in the photo. The rock is the wrong colour for example. You have to change the white balance/colour temperature. This is apart from the other issues that @Abambo pointed out!!

 

Read this about adjusting white balance:
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/white-balance.html

 

As for zooming in, yes, you do get to see more pixels, but it should still be 'clean' if one zooms to 100%.

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines