rejection for non compliant content

[dafulk]

I just had an image rejected for "non-compliant content" and was wondering what wasn't in compliance?  It is supposed to e an abstract image, hence the soft focus and  movement.  The idea is that it would be used as a background or such.  Any ideas?

[joanH · Accepted solution]

Just a blur not an abstract. I am an illustrator and this is not worthy of purchase by anyone. Better look at other abstracts. A photographer who takes this photo is not an artist. Blur and shakey is not for pro-Adobe market. Any customer can create this for a background if they want it.  No charge.

[v.poth]

HI,

here the official explanation from the User Guide for a rejection because of non compliant file:

"Non-compliant file

This reason means that your content doesn’t comply with our Contributor Agreement. Content may be non-compliant due to watermarks, inappropriate or irrelevant keywords or image titles, or questionable, or defamatory content. Your file is also rejected as non-compliant if you receive a reminder to submit a model or property release, or resolve a problem with a release, and you resubmit the file without addressing the issue."

I think you should check your keywords and the picture title. You can also publish it here and we will take a look at it.

Greets,

v.poth