rejection

[rohitbarapatre]

Why my photos got rejected?

As you can see they are not even grainy and color corrections are good and even composition is perfect. Give me a genuine reason for this?

Still got rejected. And it took f*cking 8 days to get reviewed. 

If no genuine ans then no need to review those my recent photos which are in-line for review. Thank you.

One cannot have the same perception right?

[ricky336]

What was the rejection reason given?

From my point of view, I think your images are a little underexposed. You should add a bit more exposure, brighten the images up a bit and add contrast.

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi Rohitbarapatre, 

While reading through this review, please zoom your images to between 100 and 200%. The first thing that meets the eyes is excessive noise/grain - both color and luminance.

As was said, the photos are also under exposed.

Images 3350, and 7643 are not completely in focus. You did not have sufficient depth of field.

There is also the technical issue of color fringing. Look closely around the edges. The swan to the right of image 3350 has a pink line around the edge That is color fringing.

There is green fringing around the head and back of image 1966, and also pink fringing around the edge where the neck sinks. In addition, there are too much blurred background, in the frame. That makes that composition not so great. 

There is not sufficient depth of field for 4643, and the shadows are too dark.

There is also watermark; a signature on your images.

Best wishes

JG