Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This image of a seagull got rejected for beeing Intellectual Property Violation. It has a number tag on its foot, but that not really a logo, or a company. Soooo...I have no idea why this is rejected. Do you have any ideas? The rejections seems very random....
Different reviewers have different ideas, I expect.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The number tag makes it identifiable, therefore being rejected. Anything that can be identified will most likely be rejected under property violations.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Then its kind of funny that today this image DID get aproved:
Sooo....?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
And so the plot thickens
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Different reviewers have different ideas, I expect.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Maybe it was submitted with the correct paperwork? (Seagull's owner approval)
Or maybe the seagull belongs to the photographer
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you see post nr 3?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
No, I didn't. I was just trying to understand why one would be accepted and not the other.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I had one like this. It was a alligator in the wild. I couldn't figure how it could be an Intellectual Property Violation. I was talking to a fellow photographer about it and he suggested it just may be so close to someone else photo, one that may have been purchased already that it may be considered a copy of the other photo. I don't know, sounds as reasonable as anything. Maybe that's why the second was accepted. What do you think?