Technical Issue Review

New Here ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've been adding more and more content to Adobe Stock, but beyond obvious issues like focus or exposure I can't for the life of me pin down what the technical qualifications, standards, or limits are! I've attached a handful of images that were rejected for Technical Issues that I'd love a bit more clarifaction on. Is the approval process entirely automated or does a human make a judement call?

TOPICS
Contributor critique, Troubleshooting

Views

148

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct Answers

Adobe Community Professional , May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021
Too many images.  Limit yourself to 1-2 because we're unpaid forum volunteers, not Adobe employees. #1 Major white balance problem.  It looks like you applied a blue filter which is a huge no, no in Stock Photography.  I spot checked a few others that have noticeable lighting problems.  Insufficient light is a big reason for photo rejection because it causes other problems like noise, grain, blur and artifacts. Read these links. https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.htmlhttps://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.htmlhttps://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.htmlhttps://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021
SeattleBW: B/W - Adobe would like original colour pictures. The customer can convert to B/W if he or she needs B/W, BUT it also features noise and other defects that make it unsuitable for stock:  9831: Nice picture, but you need to get rid of the artefacts and make it look natural: Look at your pictures at 100% and 200%. If you detect artefacts, correct or if they cannot be corrected, do not submit. This looks a lot like colour noise and excessive contrast. 18518623684_dafcdda59d_o: Grea...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Too many images.  Limit yourself to 1-2 because we're unpaid forum volunteers, not Adobe employees.

 

#1 Major white balance problem.  It looks like you applied a blue filter which is a huge no, no in Stock Photography. 

 

I spot checked a few others that have noticeable lighting problems.  Insufficient light is a big reason for photo rejection because it causes other problems like noise, grain, blur and artifacts.

 

Read these links.

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi Nancy, thanks for taking the time to look at a couple of my images.

 

The first image looks like it has a blue filter applied is because I was inside of a glacial crevasse when I took the photo, as I'm sure you know, shade and reflected blue light can look rather blue.

 

Thanks for providing the same links Adobe provides on the upload page!

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Regardless of what I think or where the "blue" comes from, Adobe Stock customers expect a neutral white balance in images they purchase for their million dollar commercials 🙂 

 

Compare your work with what is already represented in Adobe Stock's database.  Is your work better, the same or not as good?   Which one do you think the customer will buy?  In the end, Stock Photography comes down to what sells and what doesn't.  It's as simple as that.

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I forgot to mention.  B&W doesn't sell.  Stock customers want full color images.

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
May 21, 2021 May 21, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

SeattleBW:

  1. B/W - Adobe would like original colour pictures. The customer can convert to B/W if he or she needs B/W, BUT it also features noise and other defects that make it unsuitable for stock: Abambo_0-1621631020084.png

     

  2. 9831: Nice picture, but you need to get rid of the artefacts and make it look natural:
    Abambo_1-1621631163884.png

    Look at your pictures at 100% and 200%. If you detect artefacts, correct or if they cannot be corrected, do not submit. This looks a lot like colour noise and excessive contrast.

  3. 18518623684_dafcdda59d_o:
    Great picture but over sharpened and B/W... Get the original colour picture and rework to get rid of any artefacts, do not sharpen too much, get the colour balance right and resubmit.
  4. 35439326695_bc877b8e6a_o:
    Not sharp, colour noise and probably one or the other logo visible.
    Abambo_2-1621631667739.png

     

  5. _dsc4624-editjpg_39030539652_o: not sharp, B/W and a lot of noise and artefacts.
  6. idem for _DSC2074-Edit.
  7. _dsc4001jpg_24788650447_o: chromatic aberration, no contrast, out of focus
    Abambo_3-1621631922104.png

     

  8. _DSC0737: Wrong white balance (too cool), noise, sharpening artefacts:
    Abambo_4-1621632121782.png

     

As @Nancy OShea told you, do not post many pictures in one post. You see, most of my critiques are the same. Also as a beginner, you should start submitting one or two pictures and looking for the reaction. B/W pictures nearly never pass because all colour images can be converted to b/w, but b/w cannot recover colour.

 

And you should really read the manual beforehand... (I agree, I didn't at my beginning)! But I did discover the links at a later stage only. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines