I did not edit the file. It was an spontaneous capture, but I think that the result is in great quality. Maybe there are some thecnical errors that I dont know.
Thank for heping me.
1 Correct answer
When Adobe Stock rejects an image, they give a reason. What was the reason they gave for rejecting this image?
I can tell you that, if I worked for Adobe, I would reject it for two reasons.
1. It's too blurry. Look at the surfer's head as an example (note: I have not blown this up, this is at 100% zoom):
2. It's too noisy. Look at the buildings as an example (note: again, this is not blown up at all):
Before you submit any image, it's a good idea to view it at 100% resolution so that you can see the
...
2
Replies
When Adobe Stock rejects an image, they give a reason. What was the reason they gave for rejecting this image?
I can tell you that, if I worked for Adobe, I would reject it for two reasons.
1. It's too blurry. Look at the surfer's head as an example (note: I have not blown this up, this is at 100% zoom):
2. It's too noisy. Look at the buildings as an example (note: again, this is not blown up at all):
Before you submit any image, it's a good idea to view it at 100% resolution so that you can see the real quality of the image.
AdChoices