Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Good morning all together,
I have two images uploaded which were declined due to technical reasons.
I could understand the description of technical reasons for different kinds of pictures, but not for these illustrations.
All colour settings were selected to receice this interesting look.
Please have a look and share your opinion.
And without the raves.
Many thanks
Ben
Could be the artefacts in the image. But in that case they normally give you this as a reason. The second reason could be that they don`t see a market for this image (art).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Could be the artefacts in the image. But in that case they normally give you this as a reason. The second reason could be that they don`t see a market for this image (art).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
OK, I could follow if they decide to say that there would be no market. This might be understandable.
But the reason was clearly technical reasons, which is linked to wight balance or colour settings.
it makes no sense for me for this kind of pictures.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
A: Low commercial value. The "background" is odd, and the subject is unlear.
2: You didn't submit it with your watermark in the lower left, did you?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Good morning,
1. OK, if you are right, they can tell it to me. And they accepted the pure background. No commercial value is OK and understandable, but not with the reason for rejection as technical issues.
2. No, of course not. I used the smartphone for the post. I just have the internet version on it , and they are watermarked.