Adobe Stock Images Not Labelled as AI Generated (Appearing as Vector Art)

[Editspace]

I recently downloaded a stock image that I assumed was vector art based on the appearance and no mention of AI-generated in the title or tags only to find this was a generated image, is there a way of reporting or flagging these as it is not possible from the preview to determine these are no vector art.

Below is an example that appears to be a vector but once zoomed in has prominent AI-generated artefacts:

This is very disappointing in terms of quality control on the platform.

[joon.Stock · Accepted solution]

Please utilize vector filter as below, and vector images have file type as "AI/EPS" included

And additionaly, we have recently asked contributors to tag their content as generative AI & we’re exploring additional labeling and filtering improvements for Stock buyers.

[Editspace]

The point is not the underlying format, but that if this was non-AI generated it would likely have clean crisp lines and could be used for larger-scale design applications (ie. A0-sized print poster in the case of this). It's disappointing to have wasted credits on a stock image that is not flagged as AI generated and is full of visual artefacts, resulting in being not fit for purpose.

Note as well that this result was shown in a search for "Vector Sunset Art" and has been tagged by the creator as "vector" indicating that this should have been created in illustrator or similar, regardless of being exported as a raster image.

[joon.Stock]

Search keywords can be anything, please refer to our reply on use of filter panel and AI related concerns.  And I will send you a message.

[mattb256]

Can we get an additional subcategory for AI generative images?

[Abambo]

JPEG only images are never vector-based, independent of the technology used for its creation.