Hello,
As a company we are using Adobe Creative Cloud for teams.
We bought some picutres that we are using on our company's website.
However, as the comapny, we are the owner another website (completly different to the one mentioned above).
May we use the already bought (and used on our company's website) photos also at our second webside ?
As a company we own this two websites however the websides differ (different adresses and contenst).
I would appreacicate your help.
Licensing of Adobe stock assets is per customer (You can count your company as a customer too in this sense). It's not limited to the application. So as long as the licencing terms are respected, you can use the assets for 100 websites for your company, and still use the asset in 100 advertising campaigns, and you can still do a banner from that asset. (Nb: print runs are limited to a cumulative 500k for a standard licence. Check the licensing terms for other limitations.)
Look here for more i
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
adobe stock may be used on any of your websites.
Thank you for your response.
But is it necessay to buy every single picture (photo) twice?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
no, in general, i don't believe so. however, i recommend you check the terms of your stock carefully. if you need help with that, post in the stock forum. (i'm not a stock expert.)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Licensing of Adobe stock assets is per customer (You can count your company as a customer too in this sense). It's not limited to the application. So as long as the licencing terms are respected, you can use the assets for 100 websites for your company, and still use the asset in 100 advertising campaigns, and you can still do a banner from that asset. (Nb: print runs are limited to a cumulative 500k for a standard licence. Check the licensing terms for other limitations.)
Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788
(Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).