[locked, duplicate] License for a photo collage using MANY stocks, secondary elements?

[Kaltland]

(2) you may not incorporate a Work in to merchandise intended for sale or distribution, including on-demand products, unless (a) the Work has been modified to the extent that the new work, as incorporated into such merchandise, is not substantially similar to the Work and can qualify as an original work of authorship; or (b) the primary value of such merchandise does not lie with the Work itself;

Hi, I'm a photo-manipulator and I create very detailed artworks, full of diferent stocks, very modified.

I coming from sites like freepik and depositphotos where they RECOGNIZE stocks that plays a minor role in the final product as standard license. They say an artwork intended for sale (print) I could pay extended license ONLY for the primary elements. SECONDARY elements wouldn't need an extended license.

Is that the same for ADOBE?

thanks

https://support.freepik.com/s/article/What-is-the-difference-between-main-and-secondary-element?lang....

 https://depositphotos.com/corporate-accounts.html

[Abambo]

For Adobe licence terms, consult the linked pages hereafter. Look here for more information on licensing: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock/links-for-licensing-terms/td-p/11366788
(Disclaimer: As always with licensing, this is my interpretation of the rules. I think they are correct and advice is based on reading and interpreting the licence terms and on fair use for both the buyer and the artist/stock company, but I cannot rule out that my interpretation is wrong. I'm not an Adobe employee).

Locking this, as it is a duplicate of this post.