Reporting AI images not properly tagged

[MoonTeaThursdays]

Whlie I use -ai -generated in my search, A LOT of ai images slip through the cracks. This will serve as my reporting list thread. [Would be easier to to report a user's portfolio as I come across it.] While I have no problem with ai images, untagged AI images are disrupting workflow when I specifically want to weed them out.

dreamyart: 100 pages of ai images not tagged as ai

Searched "elderly happy black -ai" and got an image of messed up one eyed halloween pumpkins.

rodrigo: about 16 pages of mistagged images

Searched "elderly happy isolated -ai" and got a bunny wearing sunglasses...

Karrrtinki: Several pages of ai generated portarats not tagged

Definately can see its ai generated by this nightmare lady.

InputUX: untagged images and portrails of people with messed up limbs, clothing, extra fingers

For the most part I don't care about the dancing hedgehog (the dinos are messed up tho) but it all needs to be tagged correctly along with quality control.

@Contributor1 

[Contributor1]

Hello, I'm not able to log new reports on untagged generative AI assets currently. I can only provide the basic details below until I hear new guidance. I apologize for the lack of details on this.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Adobe Stock asks contributors to tag their content as generative AI with designated keyword tags. We’re exploring additional labeling and filtering improvements for Stock buyers.

[MoonTeaThursdays]

These all don't mention AI anywhere, not in the title or tags. So how do we report this issue? Just like everyone else has said, it's getting out of hand with AI inturrupting workflow and I can't even filter it out. 

[vecxel]

It's getting more and more unusable as one has to scroll through thousands of pictures which are clearly AI generated but not labeled as such. Also there should be a filter option (apart from the -ai in the search) - as people already suggested in January/February and probably before that, too.

Users I came across:
Fernando
(example: https://stock.adobe.com/de/images/portrait-of-beautiful-girl-in-carnival/558513624?prev_url=detail )

Lemart
https://stock.adobe.com/de/images/beautiful-woman-dressed-for-carnival-night-brazilian-carnival-illu...

serperm73

https://stock.adobe.com/de/images/brazilian-carnival-parade-in-rio-de-janeiro-abstract-illustration/...

[Jill_C]

Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that Adobe has any systematic method of reporting such flagrant disregard for their own rules... 

[Test Screen Name]

I can only assume that whoever set up the system originally presumed that the review system would have guaranteed a perfect series of assets, making complaints impossible. The problem with discovering AI violations is that to do it with humans would take hundreds of person years.... ironically an AI solution is needed...

[Jill_C]

Or they could just send out an email to anyone who has uploaded since they first started accepting AI assets indicating that all such Contributors must audit their own accounts and correct or delete any non-compliant images within the next 7-10 days; thereafter any accounts found to have non-compliant images would be suspended. 

[Michael231535269rxy]

Light a fire under that exploration, because those of us who use Adobe Stock daily are watching this get out of control in real time. Today a coworker showed me a portfolio almost entirely consisting of untagged AI.