When do we get a filter for AI Art? It is desperately needed.

[UncleUndead]

I use a lot of Stock for my companies marketing, and have noticed the sheer MASS of AI Art being dumped on Adobe Stock. Its mostly not even retouched AI Art, but just straight up what Midjourney (or whatever AI) generated. Thanks, but if I wanted AI Art, I'd go and subscribe to one of the many providers, and ask the AI specifically for an image.

I don't care if there is AI Art on here. If people want to buy it, so be it. But a FILTER and tags are absolutely essential to implement, yesterday. Its wasting my time, its clogging up searches and occasionally the AI images uploaded here are just an insult to my eyes.

What i'm saying is, AI Art is dragging the quality of your Stock site down, Adobe. I just want to filter the garbage.

[Abambo]

I agree that it should be possible to filter out or to search explicitly for generative AI assets.

 @joon.Stock do you have an idea about this?

[joon.Stock]

We like you to consider using -ai in your keyword search for now.  We will update here if we will have a plan set for filtering in the future.

Best regards,

[GenuineBurke]

This does not appear to work. Search for "sci-fi health bar indicator -ai"  and then search for "sci-fi health bar indicator". At the time of me writing this, both searches return 70 results, all of which are MidJourney generated. Looks like most, if not all, are from a single user "Raven" who has 35 pages of AI-generated images they are selling on Adobe Stock.  

[joon.Stock]

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Adobe Stock asks contributors to tag their content as generative AI & we’re exploring additional labeling and filtering improvements for Stock buyers. 

[Abambo]

Are they tagged with the AI keyword? If not, they don't follow the new rules (from December 2022), and they need to update their keywords and titles.

[Abambo]

. At the time of me writing this, both searches return 70 results, all of which are MidJourney generated.

By @GenuineBurke

I just tested your keyword. They do not have the AI keyword, which would be necessary to get this working, and not showing pictures tagged with AI.

However, these could also be produced by 3d rendering, which would, the initial set-up done, also allow for mass production of similar assets. I can't detect really the typical AI "faults", except for the display glibberish. But that could also be done manually. 

As I said before, the rule is out since December only, and by that date, multiple three handed Santas and different crap was out, and did pass, unexplained, the stringent Adobe quality control. As a contributor, I know thatt there is no instruction out for legacy entries, so I do not know if Adobe is planning to remove nonconforming assets or not. They remove bad assets, however, on a one to one basis. 

For me, this should be systematic, when a contributor got X assets removed for quality problems, they should get an alert that they may feel consequences and that they should review there profile for nonconforming assets. Even if some contributors feel different, customers are more important, and each customer loosing time with a bad asset is an unhappy customer. 

As said, I'm a contributor, wanting to contribute correct assets. If I would love to contribute masses, I would go into AI and generate one after the other without much effort. And I'm really not understanding moderators letting pass obviously incorrect assets from AI. It has, probably, improved in the later time, as we see more and more contributors asking for advice why their (bad) ai generated assets did not pass. We normally see multiple errors.

This said, I see no difference between correct AI generated assets and correct classical assets. The threshhold should be, if you can't detect faults in both. 

[TheRafaelAlves]

I also work with stock images to complement my work, but the AI images greatly increased the search time, I hope that this filtering of them solves it and I also suggest putting a report button, in case the image uploaders do not categorize it correctly, so that there is no risk of someone spending the credit and discovering that it is a generated image.

[Abambo]

A generated image or not, if it fits your needs its OK. But currently a lot of generative AI assets have a lot of errors, and that is a waste of time for customers. It would be good if Adobe could do corrective actions for those contributors contributing a lot of AI generated assets and not marking them accordingly. The grace periode should be over now.

Every contributor should check his assets, if they contributed AI generated assets for obvious errors and delete those voluntarily from the database and mark others accordingly. If the contributors do not conform, there should be sanctions. Currently the customers are bearing the load to detect bad assets. That should not be the case. At $10 for detecting each bad asset, I would be by now a rich man.

This said, at the beginning of the flood, moderators looked at the usual problems. 3-handed, six-fingered people were not part of the usual defects at that time. Contributors probably knew that their assets were not perfect. At least, you can assume, that they should know. 

[sohobella]

We need MORE than a filter. The filter doesn't work and defaults back each and every search. Images aren't labeled properly. We need a way to permanently disable AI-generated imgery showing up in our searches as creatives. So many terrible images flooding the site, that I can't use and can't filter out. You should be able to click a button in settings that permanently disables AI content in your account. Otherwise you are contributing to decimating creative industries.

[Ultimatebeetle]

Flooding with AI generated dumps... It's really bad.

[daniellei4510]

You woke up a year old thread. Adobe has done a lot to improve the selection process for AI images since January of 2023 but crappy AI still remains from those early days and generally won't be removed unless a customer complains. And they do and they should.

[Abambo]

The filter is in place, generative AI assets are marked. There is still a quality issue, but Adobe is working on that too.

As for the rest: you may be unhappy with the presence of generative AI assets, but these assets are to stay. Use the filter in your search to get out of the way of AI assets. And yes, I know, the filter should be sticky, it isn't.

[Abambo]

I locked this thread, as the issue has been addressed.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Use the filter settings to exclude or include generative AI from your search results.