Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
1

Repeating the functionality of ZBrush in a voxel-based software that originally had a leading concep

Explorer ,
Sep 15, 2024 Sep 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It is foolish to replicate ZBrush's features in a voxel software that originally had a leading-edge concept. With the advancement of AI, future model detailing will primarily rely on AI, making mesh sculpting software obsolete. This software should continue to focus on enhancing the convenience of quick modeling. For example, restoring the fill function of the smoothing tool or quickly connecting two adjacent blocks, which currently can only be done using this tool.

If you insist on mimicking ZBrush, why not add a masking function? It's simply a matter of introducing a depth concept. If I were developing this software, I would first make the primitive shapes in the deformation tools, such as cubes, spheres, and capsules, deformable. This would save a lot of time when sculpting things like wrinkles. For artists, even a tool like Medium can be very effective. The key lies in whether the tool is convenient and intuitive, not in adding a bunch of features that other software can already

Idea No status
TOPICS
Discussion

Views

120
Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
no replies

Have something to add?

Join the conversation