The pixels need to be razor sharp and you have to mention that the images are pixelated deliberately. We can't judge the quality in these low res uploads.
... View more
"Does having a larger portfolio, give the images a better position?" - I would say certainly yes. But it of course also depends on the 'saleability' of the images.
... View more
Ok - thanks Abambo and Jill. I found one of the removed images in removed tab and I can see that two others i my portfolio are almost like the removed one.
... View more
If I were told, I would have some kind of explanation, but it only says 'removed'. But I am sure that Adobe is right, so in fact I am only interested to see which images was removed.
... View more
"Some changes have been made to your portfolio after a re-review of some assets." But it's not possible to see which images are removed ...?
... View more
I'm not sure those artists are examples of the most authentic, but instead examples of what Adobe thinks are excellent images - which of course they are...
... View more
Look closely at the buildings, cars and wires - lots of flaws. And it's not allowed to have texts in the images. You have a lot og signs with texts.
... View more
Hi Vinona - You are a good photographer. However in 7884 the train should eighter be in focus and the background blurred or or the train even more blurred and the background in focus as it is now. I would say that 8291 is ok. 1413 - maybe the moderator think the whole cat should be sharp. Remember to write 'Selective focus' and/or 'Shallow depth of field' in the caption. 8480 is simply not a good image for stock. It's more artistic. 8483 is over saturated. That's my opinion. I think others will chime in with their opinions.
... View more
The coast is over saturated and the pasta dish is way too dark and unappetizing. I can't make the image good enough - too much sauce - but something like this.  
... View more