Agree as well. I think it was @William Spence that brought up the strong point that many educational institutions for reasons I personally would disagree with, may have chosen iOS devices, like iPads, which age like the rest of us. For Adobe to preemptively cut support to these users, especially before Apple does, is, well a selfish move imo. We're always talking about 5% market share or 20% market share, but is that all it's really about? There are potentially cases where educational apps are used by kids in rural communities that struggle with funding and can be profoundly affected by decisions like this. With the % math of how many users out of millions they get lost. They may only be 100 or 200 kids but when they're told their iPads won't work and they need to raise funds for new ones - is that really fair, is that how we want our technology, our software, to enable and enrich? Was it a poor choice for someone to choose Apple devices in that scenario, maybe, but that happens. This gets to a larger discussion about Apple and it's own brand identity, which is sort of like a Cadillac, and as we saw with the recent battery issue, there appears to be some planned obsolescence going on (not the only tech player that's doing this I'm sure). They have their reasons. But really if you step back, having the latest, greatest, fastest hardware doesn't really change the content and quality of the app. If the app is doing some powerful A.I. computation / modelling or is all about the latest graphics maybe, but that's not what most really useful apps do. It's certainly not the case with educational apps. So if I was sourcing for educational settings I think I'd look for the Toyota Corolla (support and hardware-wise) instead of the Cadillac. Just my two cents on that. All this deprecation of hardware is also terrible for the environment. I got a bit tangential from the thread there for awhile - this thread was very active and I've been thinking about it a lot. Just wanted to share some thoughts.
... View more