No it's not. I guess Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F is a default shortcut for something I never use, which is why I chose it for Flatten. This probably happened when I bought the first version of PS that allowed you to create you own shortcuts. (whenever that was) But thanks for the offer! ... View more

Here's a workaround: When the Save As dialog opens, the filename is highlighted, Press Tab, and the file type will be highlighted. Press J, and Jpeg is selected Press T, and Tiff is selected (that's on a 16 bit file, if it's 8 bit, press T twice, Targa comes up first) For Pdf, Psd, Png you may have to press P several times. This works on Windows, probably works on Mac, too. ... View more

I'm on Windows 7, and Opera, Chrome, Firefox and IE all work, except that Firefox and IE consider the link a popup, and try to block it. ... View more

Everything works fine for me - the page displays, and the hyperlink works. ... View more

Hi Anshul, I've published a new document that shows the problem more clearly at https://indd.adobe.com/view/60963cd1-ac4a-4fed-b9a6-fd2a731dd500 This was made with Image Settings set to Auto. The problem varies with the width of the browsers window, and is not visible at most widths. I'm on Windows 7, and the problem only shows in Opera and Chrome - Firefox and IE are OK. I include a screenshot from Opera. Look for blue or black lines below and on the right edge of the images. ... View more

Pretty cool. But something strange happens to the right hand egde of images. See https://indd.adobe.com/view/69fbee65-435d-4dbd-8ee6-f1b1d61a7cd1 It happens with jpg as well as png. Edit: It only happens in Chrome and Opera - Firefox and IE are ok. ... View more

Per Berntsen wrote: If someone gives me a jpg to edit, I always save it as a tiff and convert to 16-bit, to minimize furhter deterioration. I must have written this on auto pilot, because I do of course use LR to do this now. But I used to do it a lot in PS before I started to use LR. I use LR JPEG Quality settings of 77-84% for outside printing and LR 62-69% for web posting. I've yet to see any compression artifacts using these settings and I am a pixel-peeper! I'm a pixel peeper too. I have a few images on my website that require the 77-84% setting. They're all from black & white scans, with clear skies that will show blockiness at lower settings. ... View more

My view on this is somewhat different ... Jpgs should never be edited, except as a last resort. And it defeats the purpose of working with raw files if you export a jpg, and then edit it. If someone gives me a jpg to edit, I always save it as a tiff and convert to 16-bit, to minimize furhter deterioration. I realize that this will not be true 16-bit - no information is added to the image - but my impression is that it will withstand heavy editing better, and not end up with a comb-like histogram. For printing, a 100% quality jpg will usually be fine, although I prefer to use tiff myself - being more nitpicky than most ... For screen use, 100% quality is overkill, 60 is usually fine, some images might need 80, and for others 40 will be enough. ... View more

I suggest you compare the different jpgs at 100% magnification. Do you see any difference in quality? ... View more