I've actually lost count. I also don't believe they're doing anything at all. ... View more

Are you guys screwing with us?    A heck of a lot of us have been complaining, and sending feedback plus images for two years now.  It  hasn't gotten better. Only worse.  At this point. Any image show skin on a female is 'violating community guidelines'.  Regardless of what skin or how much.  It's ridiculous.   Even male subjects are setting off the babysitting program.  I have a male in jeans with suspenders. No shirt.  It not only sets off the censors. It won't allow generative expand to work either.  In fact. I haven't been able to use generative expand for at least six months now. Regardless of the image.   This nonsense must stop.   Turn off the community guidelines. Or seriously restrict what is in your 'community guidelines'.  Perhaps this would be fine in a restrictive country like Iran or Iraq.  But in the western world. I can't even use it for a cheeerleading team.  It's crazy.   ... View more

This is the best response to adobe's overreaching censorship I have read.. Thank you sir. ... View more

This just started happening to me too. With both backgrounds and ai expad. ... View more

I'm looking for a good online Ai service. Which one are you using? Thanks ... View more

Since the latest update. Adding a layer and painting over the 'offendint' skin no longer works. They are now looking at all the layers individually. If one of them sets off their censorship program. It defaults to 'you've violated community standards' nonsense.   Instead of getting better. It's getting worse.  ... View more

Adobe's censorship of Generative Ai is a real problem. Mainly because anyone with 'too much' skin showing gets the 'community standards' nonsense. A prime example is a couple I shot not long ago. Male in slacks and suspenders. No shirt. Female in shoulderless top. Short skirt. I wanted to generate a Victorian sitting room around them. It not only censored them. But now it censores them when I paint over the bare skin. Because now it 'sees' the invisible underlying layers. It's nuts. At this point. The only reason I use Lr is because of its mapping module. It won't tether to Sony. Which I use. I use Capture one for studio work and professional retouching. Lr is for a specific client that needs accurate gps metadata. For now . It's simpler and faster with Lr. As soon as a competitor provides something comparable. I'll likely be moving to them. It's kind of sad. As I've been with Adobe since Photoshop 2. But they are doing it to themselves. ... View more

Both of those plugins seem to be scams. At least from the reviews. They either don't work. Or cannot be installed. Suport is reported to be imaginary.   ... View more

That no longer works.  Since the latest update. It 'see's' all the underlying layers. Including those turned off.  That's just crazy overkill in my opinion.  ... View more

Now to find out how long this nonsense will continue. ... View more

It started again yesterday. Still not working today. Anyone have an idea of when they're going to fix this? Because at this point. The only reason I still use Lr is for the map module. Otherwise, I'd have moved over to Capture One. I can't tether my Sony to Lr. So I switched my studio work to Capture One a few years ago. Now these periods where the platform takes a dump. While Adobe never says a word to us, the users. Is getting to be a real problem. Do they actually care about us, the consumers? Or are we now just a disposable source of income? ... View more

So...they've taken an already unnecessarily complicated issue. And added another couple of steps. Just for giggles? Gotcha. Why does it seem like adobe is purposely sabotaging their own product? If the idea is to drive current users to another platform. They are doing an outstanding job of it. ... View more

That's not a viable option. I'm using it specifically because it will add shadows. Place light sources in the correct location for the way my lights have been set. Add things relatively seamlessly to the body. Such as wings, horns, halo's, etc. Just using it for creating stand alone backgrounds is as much or more trouble than going back to making composites manually. As it stood. This was a very usable replacement for composites. As it is now. If my subject, male or female. Has any amount of skin showing. Adobe censorship shuts it down. The censorship is way too strict. ... View more

Generative fill community guidelines have always been restrictive. But recently, they've gone completely overboard.  For contextI mainly us AI for creating/improving backgrounds.   It started out giveing me issues with anyone. Male or female. In bathing suits. Which in my opinion is a bit much.  So I started using a top layer painting over the 'excessive' skin so it  would work.   This was fine for a month or two.  Recently, it's gone completely overboard.  Mainly because I had to start covering more an more of the subject.  Today. it just became unusable.  I have a couple in a chair. Nothing special. Absolutely nothing showing that would put it beyond a PG rating.  But 'community guidelines' keeps interefering.  Attached is the photo in question. I even tried covering all the exposed skin. All of it. Including their faces. Again, community guidelines. This is censorshio gone crazy.  I covered their faces for privacy.  Does anyone have a suggestion for a competing AI generator that is actually usable?    ... View more

At this point. I'm going to start investigating other company's Ai programs. For some time. I had been adding a layer above my subject. So I could cover any excessive skin to get by adobe's excessive community standards censoring. As of the last update. Ai Generative fill has become completely useless for any of my work. Any skin whatsoever is now cause to activate the filter. I can paint over almost the entire model. Male or female. And it still activates. At one point. I was adding a bikini top and it activated. Even though I had the 'naughty bits' covered. A male model in swim shorts. As in basketball length shorts wouldn't render slack because of violating standards. A few minutes ago. I tried once again. With a top layer blocking most of her body. And again. It won't work. Does anyone have an Ai generator that doesn't do this? I'm open to suggestions. attached is the image that would have worked before the last update. But won't work now. ... View more

Anytime CSI Productions.  ... View more

I started adding a blank layer above it. and using a brush to block out the torso. It lets the ai believe they're wearing a cover garment.  Just remove the layer once you've got your expansion.  ... View more

Less overly sensative?  I found them to be more sensative.  I've been trying to add lighting bolts to an image. I get the 'violated guidelines' every single time I try.  It's come to the point that literally anything I try 'violates' guidlines.  What exactly can I generate that will work?   Today I've been trying to add lightning to an image. Even this violated guidelines.  I'm at a loss. If it nothing works. Why have iit at all?  ... View more

The check is when you agree to the crop. At the top of the image.  You have a check mark,  Once I click it. The AI generator starts. If I cancel. It also cancels the crop.  This is very annoying, and messes with my workflow.  Is there a way to stop it from running every single time I crop an image?   ... View more